COVID-19 Op-ed

Top-down Violence in the Face of a Pandemic: An Argument for a Social Protection Floor

Written by admin

Josemaria J.
University of the Philippines, Diliman

The Philippine Government has now driven the country to
disarray. From its initial denial of the gravity of the COVID-19 virus to
“loaded” legislation giving the President additional powers in the form of
the Bayanihan to Heal as One Act, the Government continues to exacerbate the
crisis. Found in the wreckage: health workers overworked, underpaid, and
undersupplied, and the poor seeking income and state support. Atop the heap
callously stands the government, devoid of any compassion in its policy
implementations.Its shortcomings have hit the most vulnerable persons amidst
the pandemic: the elderly, indigent, and frontline health workers. They have
suffered most, but many others have too. As the Government increased uniformed
personnel presence, news reports of human rights abuses have surfaced. Two
weeks ago, police beat a man exiting a mosque for supposedly violating
quarantine protocol (Cabico, 2020). Days before,
barangay officials detained curfew violators in a dog
cage (Famatigan, 2020). People on the fringes of society suffer from a lack
of basic necessities whilst those elected to serve continue to enjoy decadent
living. This is violence.Violence is not confined to directly injurious
physical acts. Incompetent governance that ultimately raises the death toll
is violence. Withholding relief goods from the poor is violence. Ignoring the
pleas of the starving is violence. Why does the Government continue to
inflict violence on its citizenry, even in a time of crisis? It simply does
not care for its people. Indeed, civil society and the private sector already
bear much of the burden of providing for the most vulnerable, while the
Philippine Government in the past three years spat upon human rights. The
citizenry deserves social and economic wellbeing, and it is what the
Government is in power for to provide.The Philippines is signatory to the
1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Article 25 of the Declaration
provides that everyone has a right to an adequate standard of living,
“including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social
services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness,
disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances
beyond his control.” (The United Nations, 1948, art. 25.1) Has the Government
fully provided these entitlements, more so in a time of crisis that strains
access to food supply and medical care?Now, this is where social protection
comes in. The Government must, first and foremost, consider “the provision of
essential services and transfers for all individuals in need of protection in
an effort to prevent them from falling into abject poverty or to assist them
out of poverty.” (“Sharing Innovative Experiences, vol. 18 – Successful
Social Protection Floor Experiences”, 2011, p.13)   Thus, by
guaranteeing a basic standard of living, more low-income individuals can be
integrated into the formal economy, and raise their current standard of
living (“Sharing Innovative Experiences, vol. 18 – Successful Social
Protection Floor Experiences”, 2011). Higher income also means higher tax
revenues which can be used to improve existing social protection programs
(“Sharing Innovative Experiences, vol. 18 – Successful Social Protection
Floor Experiences”, 2011). Different countries in the global South have
successfully implemented social protection floor programs at low cost,
reducing poverty and income inequality (“Sharing Innovative Experiences, vol.
18 – Successful Social Protection Floor Experiences”, 2011). This requires
political will. Adequate housing means no homeless sleeping on sidewalks;
cash transfers to those unable to work mean financial security; food
subsidies mean no desperate protesters; and access to proper medical care and
better healthcare infrastructure means no one dies untreated. When compassion
is first integrated in state policies, and each person’s rights are seen
inalienable, all stand to benefit.To close, I do not see this Government even
wanting to effect this change. Like I said, it does not care for the
downtrodden. To the young, capable, and compassionate leaders surfacing –
those deservedly called public-servants – I can only hope the culture of
genuine servitude persists. As long as it does, a truly egalitarian society
is within reach. Until then, we – student-activists, educators, workers,
farmers, and other freedom fighters – shall continue beating our drums and
chanting our calls, for silence in the face of oppression is acquiescence,
and with resistance comes change.ReferencesCabico,
G.K. (2020, March 26). HRW: Philippines must enforce quarantine without
‘cruel, inhuman’ treatment. The Philippine Star.
Accessed April 8, 2020.Famatigan, M.E. (2020, March 21). Barangay captain
cages curfew violators in Laguna. Rappler.
Accessed April 8, 2020.(2011, December 10). Sharing Innovative Experiences,
Volume 18 – Successful Social Protection Floor Experiences.
Accessed April 4, 2020.The United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of
Human Rights.
Accessed April 4, 2020.

About the author